Mediaweek
Vinyl Media

Our Sites

Logo Rolling StoneLogo VarietyLogo MediaweekLogo The Music NetworkLogo Tone DeafLogo BragLogo Concrete PlaygroundLogo Refinery29

Network Partners

Art NewsBGRBillboardCrunchyrollDeadlineDirtEnthusiast GamingFootwear NewsFunimationGamelancerGold DerbyHypebeastIndieWireKidoodleLife Without AndySheKnowsSourcing JournalSporticoSPYStyleCasterThe Hollywood ReporterToon GogglesTVLineVibe

'An absurd situation': The Nightly's De Ceglie argues social media platforms should be treated like publishers

Elon Musk has made headlines this week with his push to keep the vision of the near-fatal stabbing of a Sydney bishop mid-sermon up on X.

By Tess ConneryPublished Apr 26, 2024
2 min read
Elon Musk and X

“Social media platforms are not responsible publishers,” The Nightly’s editor-in-chief Anthony DeCeglie has written in an editorial published on the site on Wednesday.

The piece responds to Elon Musk making headlines with his push to keep the vision of the near-fatal stabbing of a Sydney bishop mid-sermon up on X – despite Australia's eSafety Commissioner telling Musk and the site that it must take down the footage. Musk claims keeping the footage up is an expression of free speech.

Graphic footage of the Bondi stabbing attacks circulated on X only days before.

DeCeglie points out that, “Australia has long had in place laws that set out the responsibilities of publishers.”

Publishers can’t publish material that is considered indecent or offensive, and if they do, can be held criminally responsible. There are exceptions made for content being used as art, within a clear set of guidelines.

“The provisions in our criminal codes dealing with such material are rarely used, because responsible publishers take seriously their obligations,” DeCeglie writes.

“The bosses of tech giants have proved again and again through their inaction that they don't care how vile the material posted on their platforms is. Not their fault and not their problem, is their attitude.

Mediaweek
MEDIAWEEK MORNING REPORT

The leading media trade publication in Australia.

Get our top stories straight to your inbox daily by signing up to our Newsletter

By providing your information, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We use vendors that may also process your information to help provide our services.

“That's despite the fact these platforms host vast amounts of material so vile, so obscene, to be beyond the comprehension of any decent person.”

DeCeglie argues that publishing the footage currently available on X would land a publisher with “significant criminal penalties,” but current laws don’t hold social media sites to the same standards.

“It's an absurd situation. Our laws need to deal with these social media platforms as what they are – publishers.

“That comes with some hefty responsibilities both legal and moral. These organisations must start living up to them."

More from Mediaweek

Mediaweek
MEDIAWEEK MORNING REPORT

The leading media trade publication in Australia.

Get our top stories straight to your inbox daily by signing up to our Newsletter

By providing your information, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We use vendors that may also process your information to help provide our services.